I got a Tandberg LTO-6 drive off eBay recently as a way to have an offline, air-gapped third backup of data that normally lives on my NAS or backup storage server.
Although my NAS is already backed up daily to a ZFS pool on another server, all of these systems are networked—and therefore, vulnerable to ransomware, malware, sloppy sysadmin commands on the terminal, and even electric-surge-caused hardware malfunction. And although I do back up some data to cloud storage, not all data is worth the recurring monthly charges of S3/Glacier/Backblaze B2. Besides, playing with hardware is fun.
Magnetic tape, which can store as much as 2.5 TB uncompressed (in LTO-6, the generation I started with) or 12 TB uncompressed (in LTO-8, the current generation as of mid-2021), is a time-tested option that fits in perfectly.
Veeam Backup & Replication Community Edition works well with standalone tape drives. However, it’s a proprietary system that uses Microsoft Tape Format for the on-tape format—a format that is very challenging to recover yourself without using proprietary tools. Moreover, the tape backup mechanism in Community Edition (i.e., without using licensed NAS backup features) is not meant for backing up large volumes of general purpose files—it’s really designed for archiving VM backups from disk.
LTFS also works. However, my initial attempts to use it were foiled by a Microsemi HBA that doesn’t support TLR. Also, if you don’t use proprietary tape software, LTFS can actually perform more slowly for a bunch of reasons (e.g., multithreaded copying, large number of small files, etc.).
When using a Linux desktop, way more options are available using decades-old software that was designed for tape from the get-go.
Remember tar (tape archive)?
Turns out: tar is as usable in 2021 for tape as it was thirty years ago.
Piping a sorted list of filenames into tar
find 'Folder/' -type f | sort | tar -cvf /dev/nst0 --no-recursion -T -
Getting checksums before tar
find 'Folder/' -type f -print0 | sort -z | xargs -0 sha256sum | tee Folder.20210812.sha256sum
You can use sha256sum
directly with a glob spec of files, but find
will recurse through directories.
Buffering tar with mbuffer
tar --label="archive-name" -b512 -cvf - | sudo mbuffer -m 8G -P 80 -s 262144 -o /dev/nst0
tar -b512
sets the blocking factor to 512 so that each tar record matches the 262144-byte block size of the tape drive (512 × 512 = 262144).
mbuffer -P 80
tries to fill the buffer to 80% before starting to write out.
mbuffer -s 262144
matches the 262144-byte block size.
Verifying the contents of the tape archive
tar -tvf /dev/nst0
This only reads through the end of the file. You need to advance to the next file to read through another tape archive.
Advancing the tape
mt -f /dev/nst0 status
mt -f /dev/nst0 fsf 1
mt -f /dev/nst0 bsf
mt -f /dev/nst0 rewind
mt -f /dev/nst0 eject
Enabling hardware encryption (drive dependent)
This Tandberg drive seems to have the same guts as an HP LTO-6 drive. 256-bit encryption keys can be generated and loaded, but these drives require an extra flag (-a 1
). The convenience advantage of enabling hardware encryption is that we can stream from tar directly to tape and back, and the encryption is all transparent to the applications.
stenc -g 256 -k keyfile.key -kd "optional key description"
stenc -f /dev/nst0 -e on -a 1 --ckod --protect -k keyfile.key
stenc -f /dev/nst0 --detail
stenc -f /dev/nst0 -e off -a 1
Bonus: Encoding a barcode into cartridge memory (aka LTO-CM or MAM) using IBM ITDT
The barcode is set in the RFID memory chip and is assigned attribute number 0806. HPE’s LTFS utilities can encode it as part of the LTFS format process, but I figured out how to do this when not using LTFS.
Every attribute is preceded by a 5-byte attribute header, which contains:
- 2 bytes: the attribute number itself (hex 08 06)
- 2 bytes: format—apparently ASCII (hex 01 00)
- 1 byte: length—this has to be 32 decimal (hex 20)
The remaining 32 bytes should be padded with spaces. An example 37-byte binary file, when dumped using xxd (hexadecimal representation on the left, ASCII on the right) should look like this:
$ xxd 0806.bin 00000000: 0806 0100 2046 4a4b 3637 304c 3620 2020 .... FJK670L6 00000010: 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 2020 00000020: 2020 2020 20
We can try to read the attribute from the cartridge using ITDT:
.\itdt.exe -f \\.\tape0 readattr -p 0 -a 0806 -d 0806.bin
And we can try to encode it to the cartridge using ITDT:
.\itdt.exe -f \\.\tape0 writeattr -p 0 -a 0806 -s 0806.bin
Here’s the evidence that the barcode was properly encoded:
Appendix: Source Code
These are backups of the open source programs used above, providing some assurance that even if these programs end up disappearing from Linux distributions’ package repositories, I will still be able to access the data stored on these tapes. (There’s probably nothing to worry about here; it’s more likely LTO-6 drives will be EOL long before tar and mt-st disappear.)
- stenc
- Upstream repository: https://github.com/scsitape/stenc
- License: GPL 2
- Tarball sourced from https://github.com/scsitape/stenc/releases/tag/1.1.1
- mbuffer
- Upstream: https://www.maier-komor.de/mbuffer.html
- License: GPL 3
- mt-st
- Upstream repository: https://github.com/iustin/mt-st
- License: GPL 2
- Tarball sourced from https://github.com/iustin/mt-st/releases/tag/v1.4
Thank you for posting this!
I also wonder if it’s possible to use tar for incremental backups with LTO?
Sort of. While GNU tar supports incremental archives and appending to archives, it’s impractical to do that on LTO. That’s because if you don’t keep a file list of the tar contents OUTSIDE of the tape (e.g., as a plain text file on your HDD or as the first file in the tar), it will be impractically long to list the contents of the tar — tar doesn’t have an index like other archive formats, it has to linearly scan through the bytes on the LTO tape (skipping over the data of the stored files) to list out what’s in the archive.
That said, LTO does support storing multiple “files” on the tape — each tar archive can be one “file” marked with a filemark. So you can create a new tar archive appended to the end of the free space on that tape, using a command line flag like
-N "7 days ago"
to sweep in only files that have last-modified timestamps more recent than 7 days.As a practical matter, it may take a lot of effort to roll your own incremental backup scheme using GNU tar. There might be better ways out there in 2023.